Conditions for optimality: Admissibility and consistency

-

Admissibility and consistency are conditions that can guarantee optimality of solutions in heuristic search algorithms.

A heuristic function is said to be admissible if it never overestimates the actual cost of reaching the goal node from any given node. In other words, the heuristic function always returns a value that is less than or equal to the actual cost of reaching the goal node. If a heuristic function is admissible, then any algorithm that uses it to guide its search is guaranteed to find an optimal solution.

A heuristic function is said to be consistent (or monotonic) if the estimated cost of reaching a successor node plus the cost of moving from the current node to that successor is always less than or equal to the estimated cost of reaching the current node. In other words, the heuristic function is consistent if the estimated cost of reaching a node is always less than or equal to the sum of the estimated cost of reaching one of its successors and the cost of moving from the current node to that successor. If a heuristic function is consistent, then any algorithm that uses it to guide its search is guaranteed to find an optimal solution.

In general, consistency is a stronger condition than admissibility, as any consistent heuristic function is also admissible. However, some admissible heuristic functions may not be consistent.

Admissibility and consistency are important conditions for optimality in heuristic search algorithms, such as A* search. If the heuristic function used in the algorithm is admissible and consistent, then the algorithm is guaranteed to find the optimal solution with the lowest possible cost. If the heuristic function is not admissible or consistent, then the algorithm may not find the optimal solution or may take longer to do so.

In summary, admissibility and consistency are conditions that guarantee optimality of solutions in heuristic search algorithms. An admissible heuristic function never overestimates the actual cost of reaching the goal node, while a consistent heuristic function ensures that the estimated cost of reaching a node is always less than or equal to the sum of the estimated cost of reaching one of its successors and the cost of moving from the current node to that successor. If a heuristic function is both admissible and consistent, then any algorithm that uses it to guide its search is guaranteed to find an optimal solution.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OpenSolaris and Linux virtual memory and address space structures

-
OpenSolaris and Linux virtual memory and address space structures Read Aloud Stop Reading OpenSolaris and Linux virtual memory and address space structures OpenSolaris and Linux are both popular operating systems that use virtual memory to manage system resources. In this article, we will compare the virtual memory and address space structures of OpenSolaris and Linux. Segmented address space model OpenSolaris uses a segmented address space model, where the address space is divided into multiple segments, each of which is used to store a specific type of data. For example, the text segment is used to store executable code, while the data segment is used to store global and static variables. This model allows for more efficient memory allocation and management, as it reduces the fragmentation of memory. Linux, on the other hand, uses a flat address space model, where the entire address space is treated as a single unit. This model is simpler than the segmented mode
Click Here to Read

Tying top-down and bottom-up object and memory page lookups with the actual x86 page translation and segmentation

-
Tying top-down and bottom-up object and memory page lookups with the actual x86 page translation and segmentation Read Aloud Stop Reading Tying top-down and bottom-up object and memory page lookups with the actual x86 page translation and segmentation Object-oriented programming (OOP) and virtual memory management are two essential concepts in modern computer systems. In this article, we will explore the connection between the top-down and bottom-up approaches used in OOP and memory page lookups, and the x86 page translation and segmentation mechanisms. Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches in OOP In OOP, two main approaches are used to design and implement software systems: top-down and bottom-up. The top-down approach starts with the system's high-level requirements and design, and then the details are gradually added until the system is fully specified. The bottom-up approach, on the other hand, starts with the low-level details and gradually bui
Click Here to Read

OpenSolaris and UNIX System V system administration pragmatics: service startup, dependencies, management, system updates

-
Read Aloud Stop Reading System administration is an important aspect of managing any operating system, and OpenSolaris is no exception. In this article, we will discuss some of the pragmatic approaches to system administration in OpenSolaris, including service startup, dependencies, management, and system updates. Service Startup: One of the primary tasks of system administration is to manage the startup of various services on the system. In OpenSolaris, this is done using the Service Management Facility (SMF). SMF provides a uniform and consistent way to manage services across the system. SMF is based on the concept of service instances, where each service is defined as an instance of a service contract. Service contracts define the characteristics of the service, including its dependencies, runtime properties, and logging information. SMF provides a number of commands that allow administrators to manage services. The svcs command lists the current status of all servic
Click Here to Read